11 July, 2024
Report Link: How firms can respond to the 2024 regulatory landscape | EY – US
Size of Report: 28 pages
EY’s report differs from most of the others and is worth a read for those in risk and compliance roles. Whilst the topic might oftentimes seem dry, this report does a great job to summarise and explain a lot of what is happening in the next few years.
EY makes the case that some of the industry instability seen recently was caused by regulation being out of step with technology and the speed at which consumers can now react. As such, the regulatory landscape needs to take some big leaps. With a lot happening in payments and financial services there are lots of regulatory and supervisory changes on the horizon that need to be acted on now, with largely APAC/Australia region and Europe region leading the way on initial drafts.
The global economic environment does lead to 2024 bringing about asset quality and at present many countries are regulating data, technology and climate issues in ways that follow national agendas. This adds layers to complexity.
The report highlights that a growing number of regulators are performing stress tests on ever larger numbers of banks and even on smaller banks. For board and oversight roles, some regions are looking at putting remuneration compensation clawback clauses into contracts.
With Regulators moving to data-driven supervision, enhancing their role as data hubs, they focus on improved data, transparency, access, interoperability, data harmonisation and standardisation. This will drive organisations to use (collaborative) tools to help prove they are delivering transparency and oversight.
As digitalisation becomes business-as-usual, some firms are struggling to update legacy systems. The latest EY/IIF global risk management survey found 94% of chief risk officers say they need “some” or “many” new skills and resources to meet the changing needs of the risk-management function, with data science and cyber topping the list of the most desirable skills.
In Payments lots is going on:
For example, Australians lost a record sum of more than US$2bn to scams in 2021, scams are made possible by a wide variety of technologies. Linked to this, the EU “single rulebook” regulation provides guidelines for completing customer due diligence, disclosing identities of beneficial owners etc and this introduces the sixth Anti-Money Laundering directive, which includes national provisions on oversight, Financial Intelligence Units and information-sharing requirements and establishing the European Anti-Money Laundering Authority. This all points to the need to use more sophisticated technology to support fraud detection, such as AI.
Threading all the above, operational resilience is a key regulatory focus globally. There is a shift to view compliance through a consumer harm lens. In Australia, APRA has made operational resilience a heightened focus, whilst in Europe firms must now comply with the EU’s Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA) from 1 January 2025; making 2024 paramount for DORA readiness.
If you have enjoyed the content and would like to engage with us, please feel free to: